Thoreau’s “Writing the Wilderness” brings up the idea that writing was becoming as tame, predictable and controlled as the wilderness was. The expansion of society removed the “wild” from both the wilderness and the days writing. “Dullness is but another name for tameness” (Thoreau, 23). With the shift from smaller towns to more organized and ‘civilized’ provinces and cities, Thoreau clearly feels like man was shifting from an environment where it was one with nature to one that was less nature ‘aware’ so to speak. With this move away from nature, the writings of the time (as believed by Thoreau) also made a big change. Our increased understanding of science limits our ability to think free and “wildly”. This is strengthened by the increased education of the time. Before, when attempting to explain something like the movement of the sun or the tides of the oceans, people came up with grandiose stories of gods. In Thoreau’s time, people were much more educated and ‘civilized’, and as a result would’t believe things like that. This shift took the ‘wild’ side out of writing. People had become dull in their words because they had become tame in the way they lived their life.
Thoreau is very convincing in his argument. At first glance I wouldn’t have expected a shift to a more civilized society to have an impact on essentially what Thoreau is calling “free thinking.” But after reading he had me convinced. It makes sense that the increased education and civilization could lead to a ‘tame’ or ‘dull’ way of thinking, because the rest of our way of living had become so organized and predictable.
Thoreau, Henry David, “Writing the Wilderness.” Walking. Berkeley, CA: Nature, 1993. Print.